Understanding the Hidden Costs of Custom Development & How to Prevent Legacy Traps

Government agencies have traditionally depended on custom software development to fulfill their unique operational and legislative requirements. While this approach provides highly tailored solutions, it has led to the significant accumulation of technical debt. This technical debt, resulting from decades of custom development and patchwork updates, now manifests as legacy systems that hinder efficiency, security, and innovation. This white paper explores the hidden costs associated with maintaining these outdated systems, examines the impact on government operations, and proposes strategies for modernization and mitigation.

CUSTOM DEVELOPMENT – A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD

Custom software development has allowed government agencies to address specific needs that off-the-shelf solutions could not. These systems were designed to meet unique regulatory, operational, and security requirements. However, the benefits of custom solutions came with long-term drawbacks, including:

• Complexity and Rigid Structures: Custom systems often lack flexibility, making them difficult to update or integrate with new technologies.
• Resource Intensive Maintenance: Maintaining and updating these systems requires specialized knowledge and significant resources.
• Obsolescence: Rapid technological advancements have rendered many custom solutions obsolete, creating a gap between current needs and existing capabilities.

TECHNICAL DEBT ACCUMULATION

Technical debt refers to the long-term costs associated with choosing suboptimal solutions
for short-term benefits. In the context of state software systems, technical debt manifests
in several ways:

• Increased Operational Costs: Legacy systems often require extensive maintenance and are prone to failures, leading to higher operational costs.
• Security Vulnerabilities: Outdated systems are more susceptible to cyber threats due to unsupported software, lack of patches, and obsolete security protocols.
• Inhibited Innovation: The inflexibility of legacy systems stifles innovation and the adoption of new technologies, preventing agencies from leveraging modern solutions to improve service delivery.

THE HIDDEN COSTS OF TECHNICAL DEBT

While the immediate impacts of legacy systems may seem manageable, the long-term implications can be profound and costly.

Financial Implications

1. Maintenance and Support: The cost of maintaining legacy systems is significantly higher compared to alternatives. Specialized skills required for support are scarce and expensive.
2. Downtime and Failures: Frequent system failures and downtimes disrupt critical operations and result in financial losses due to the need for emergency repairs.

Security Risks

1. Cybersecurity Threats: Legacy systems are prime targets for cyber attacks, as they often lack modern security features and are no longer supported by vendors.
2. Data Breaches: Technical debt often includes outdated third-party libraries and frameworks that may have known vulnerabilities. Unmaintained systems can lead to data breaches, compromising sensitive data and eroding public trust.

Operational Inefficiencies

1. Manual Processes: Legacy systems often require manual intervention, leading to slower
   processes and increased error rates.
2. Lack of Integration: Inability to integrate with modern systems and applications hampers overall efficiency and effectiveness.
3. 3 Key Resource Dependency: Custom developed systems are often highly dependent on original developers who may have unique knowledge not documented or shared with the team, leading to gaps if they are unavailable.

Stifling Innovation

1. Barrier to Modernization: The rigid nature of legacy systems prevents agencies from
   adopting new technologies that could enhance service delivery, accessibility compliance, and operational efficiency.
2. Administrative Morale: Working with outdated technology can lead to frustration among administrative users, reducing morale and productivity.

HIGHER STAKES FOR STATE AGENCIES

The risks associated with technical debt are significantly higher for state agencies because
of their reliance on software to ensure the security, accuracy, and accessibility of public data.
These responsibilities underscore the importance of robust software systems, as they are
integral to state governance and the democratic process.

The consequences of such failures are severe, including diminished public trust, legal challenges, and increased operational costs, underscoring the critical importance of addressing
technical debt in state systems.

STRATEGIES FOR MITIGATING TECHNICAL DEBT

While public officials can mitigate the risks associated with existing legacy systems, the
cost of technical debt continues to accumulate, leading to increased maintenance expenses,
reduced system agility, and heightened security vulnerabilities over time. This escalating
burden of technical debt can drive state agencies to invest in new technology, ultimately
ensuring their systems remain up-to-date and capable of meeting evolving needs.

Strategic Investment in New Technologies

1. Cloud Computing: Leveraging cloud services can provide scalable, cost-effective, and
   secure alternatives to legacy systems.
2. Cybersecurity Enhancements: Investing in modern security solutions is crucial to protect against evolving cyber threats.

Platform cloud-based solutions will open new opportunities for innovation and transformation of business processes in government organizations. Gartner recommends government CIOs implement a multicloud strategy to maximize these opportunities and mitigate the complexities of incremental modernization across multiple systems.

*Gartner (April 2024)

Leveraging SaaS Solutions

Cloud computing technology, particularly Software as a Service (SaaS), presents a viable alternative to the challenges posed by legacy systems. By transitioning to SaaS, state agencies can alleviate the ongoing costs and risks associated with custom-developed software while gaining numerous advantages that support their mission-critical operations.

Cost Efficiency and Predictable Budgeting

SaaS solutions eliminate the need for extensive in-house maintenance and reduce overall IT expenditure. With a subscription-based model, agencies can enjoy predictable budgeting, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives and allowing for better financial planning.

Enhanced Security and Compliance

SaaS providers invest heavily in robust security measures, including regular updates and compliance with the latest security standards. This ensures that sensitive public data remains protected without the agency bearing the burden of managing complex security protocols, thereby enhancing the overall security posture of state systems.

Scalability and Flexibility

SaaS platforms are designed to scale effortlessly with an agency’s needs. Whether handling
peak periods such as elections or managing fluctuating demands in state services, SaaS solutions can adjust capacity and functionality without significant manual intervention. This scalability ensures that systems can grow and adapt in response to changing requirements.

Agility and Innovation

By removing the constraints of legacy systems, SaaS enables agencies to quickly deploy updates and new features. This agility fosters innovation in public service delivery, allowing for more efficient processes and improved citizen engagement. The ability to rapidly implement changes also ensures that state systems remain compliant with evolving regulations and standards.

Improved User Experience

Modern SaaS platforms prioritize user experience with intuitive interfaces, seamless integration across devices, and enhanced accessibility. This not only improves satisfaction among agency staff but also enhances public engagement and trust in government services. An improved user experience can lead to higher adoption rates and more effective service delivery.

Focus on Core Competencies

Leveraging SaaS allows government agencies to redirect focus from managing IT infrastructure and software maintenance to core competencies. This strategic shift enables agencies to devote more resources and attention to mission-critical tasks, ultimately improving service delivery and constituent satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Breaking the cycle of technical debt involves recognizing the hidden costs associated with custom development, such as increased maintenance expenses, security vulnerabilities, and reduced system agility. These costs accumulate over time, leading to inefficient and outdated legacy systems that are difficult and expensive to maintain. By transitioning to SaaS solutions, state agencies can avoid the challenges of technical debt associated with legacy systems. SaaS offers regular updates, enhanced security, scalability, and cost predictability, preventing the buildup of technical debt and ensuring systems remain modern, efficient,
and responsive to the needs of citizens.

* Gartner. (2024, April 16). Gartner announces the top government technology trends for 2024.

---