As cyber threats continue to evolve, governments are strengthening security requirements for vendors handling sensitive data. SOC 2, FedRAMP, and StateRAMP/GovRAMP certifications have emerged as key security benchmarks. These certifications ensure vendors adhere to strict controls for protecting election systems and data integrity. 

State & Local Agency Considerations

✓ Authorization vs. Certification – FedRAMP and StateRAMP/GovRAMP are authorizations that require ongoing security monitoring, while SOC 2 is an attestation based on an audit of security controls.
Understanding the difference helps in vendor evaluation.

✓ Cloud vs. On-Premises Solutions – FedRAMP and StateRAMP/GovRAMP apply primarily to cloud-based solutions, while SOC 2 can cover both cloud and on-premises software. Agencies should clarify security expectations based on their deployment model.

✓ Timeline – Achieving security certifications and authorizations is a multi-step process that can take years, depending on the framework. Agencies should account for these timelines when planning procurements, ensuring vendors are already on a compliance path to avoid delays in system deployment or upgrades.

✓ StateRAMP/GovRAMP Emerging as the New Standard –  Because it provides a structured approach to assessing cloud security risks for state and local government agencies. Many states are adopting it as a requirement for technology vendors to ensure they meet stringent security standards without duplicating federal processes.

✓ Alignment with NIST Standards – Because NIST 800-53 serves as the foundation for FedRAMP and StateRAMP/GovRAMP, vendors with existing NIST-aligned security programs are often better positioned to achieve compliance.

✓ Ask for Evidence – Vendors should provide SOC 2 reports, FedRAMP authorization packages, or StateRAMP/GovRAMP verification upon request. These documents outline their security posture and compliance status.

✓ Shared Security Model – While vendors implement security controls, agencies are responsible for internal security controls and risk assessments.

✓ Risk-Based Decision Making – If a vendor is not yet fully compliant, assess whether they are on a defined compliance path and committed to meeting security standards in a reasonable timeframe.

✓ Cost of Compliance – Vendors who have achieved FedRAMP or StateRAMP /GovRAMP authorization have invested significantly in security. Agencies should recognize that higher compliance standards may come with increased costs, but also provide stronger protections.

✓ Ongoing Security Responsibilities – Achieving compliance is only the first step. Election Officials should partner with vendors committed to continuous monitoring, regular security updates, and proactive risk management.